Study: Most kids' fast-food meals have too many calories
http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/diet.fitness/08/04/kids.meals.ap/index.html?eref=rss_healthYou think! Thank God the Associated Press released this information. Give me a break! I always thought it was just the polluted tap water that was ballooning our nations youth to a level that brought Fat Albert close to the norm. The next thing they will be telling us is that the lack of physical activity of our kids is making them ginourmous.
This article epitomizes the useless, never ending avalanche of information coming from organizations, like the Center for Service in the Public, making the obvious appear to be profound, yet offering only fear and no solution. Their report looked into the nutritional quality of kids' meals at 13 major restaurant (sic) chains. The center found 93 percent of 1,474 possible choices at the 13 chains exceed 430 calories — an amount that is one-third of what the National Institute of Medicine recommends that children ages 4 through 8 should consume in a day.
I would love to know what the cost of this report was. How does this qualify as a study? Find out how many kids offerings have more than 430 calories, using public displayed nutritional information. I am sure that took quite a team to uncover such a wealth of information.
The report gratuitously states there are some healthy choices on restaurant menus, though, “parents have to navigate a minefield of calories, fat and salt to find them." This is typical of what we get. The wording creates fear and infers and is meant to steer the reader into believing the task of “navigating that minefield” is beyond their capabilities. This is where our money is spent to educate us on health issues.
Here is a typical pompous, vacuous, finger pointing stand of power and legitimacy by this type of bureaucratic cluster *#@& operations: "Parents want to feed their children healthy meals, but America's chain restaurants are setting parents up to fail," CSPI nutrition policy director Margo G. Wootan said in a statement. "McDonald's, Burger King, KFC, and other chains are conditioning kids to expect burgers, fried chicken, pizza, French fries, macaroni and cheese, and soda in various combination at almost every lunch and dinner." This ridiculous noxious blast hot air absolute verifies the value of Margo G. Wootan’s and the Center for Service in the Public’s position. The problem couldn’t have anything to do with absolutely zero applicable nutrition education in our education system and the miraculous addition of a dependence of processed food in our diet.
Joan Lowy, the journalist of this AP article, did add a little logic and intelligence to this piece to counter the obnoxious misinformation by the CSPI:
The National Restaurant Association, a business group of about 945,000 restaurants and food outlets, said the trend in the industry was to provide "more detailed nutritional information and choice in menu options for consumers."
But the group stressed that "exercising parental responsibility is key to childhood nutrition." The report, it said, "fails to acknowledge the essential role of nutrition education, physical activity and parental responsibility in childhood nutrition — good eating habits and healthy living must be established in the home
Touché
Think about it! Of course, this is only my opinion and I might be wrong.
You think! Thank God the Associated Press released this information. Give me a break! I always thought it was just the polluted tap water that was ballooning our nations youth to the level that Fat Albert is close to the norm. The next thing they will be telling us is that the lack of physical activity of our kids is making them ginourmous.
This article epitomizes the useless, never ending avalanche of information coming from organizations, like the Center for Service in the Public, making the obvious appear to be profound, yet offering only fear and no solution. Their report looked into the nutritional quality of kids' meals at 13 major restaurant (sic) chains. The center found 93 percent of 1,474 possible choices at the 13 chains exceed 430 calories — an amount that is one-third of what the National Institute of Medicine recommends that children ages 4 through 8 should consume in a day.
I would love to know what the cost of this report was. How does this qualify as a study? Find out how many kids offerings have more than 430 calories, using public displayed nutritional information. I am sure that took quite a team to uncover such a wealth of information.
The report gratuitously states there are some healthy choices on restaurant menus, though, “parents have to navigate a minefield of calories, fat and salt to find them." This is typical of what we get. The wording creates fear and infers and is meant to steer the reader into believing the task of “navigating that minefield” is beyond their capabilities. This is where our money is spent to educate us on health issues.
Here is a typical pompous, vacuous, finger pointing stand of power and legitimacy by this type of bureaucratic cluster *#@& operations: "Parents want to feed their children healthy meals, but America's chain restaurants are setting parents up to fail," CSPI nutrition policy director Margo G. Wootan said in a statement. "McDonald's, Burger King, KFC, and other chains are conditioning kids to expect burgers, fried chicken, pizza, French fries, macaroni and cheese, and soda in various combination at almost every lunch and dinner." This ridiculous noxious blast hot air absolute verifies the value of Margo G. Wootan’s and the Center for Service in the Public’s position. The problem couldn’t have anything to do with absolutely zero applicable nutrition education in our education system and the miraculous addition of a dependence of processed food in our diet.
Joan Lowy, the journalist of this AP article, did add a little logic and intelligence to this piece to counter the obnoxious misinformation by the CSPI:
The National Restaurant Association, a business group of about 945,000 restaurants and food outlets, said the trend in the industry was to provide "more detailed nutritional information and choice in menu options for consumers."
But the group stressed that "exercising parental responsibility is key to childhood nutrition." The report, it said, "fails to acknowledge the essential role of nutrition education, physical activity and parental responsibility in childhood nutrition — good eating habits and healthy living must be established in the home
Touché
Think about it! Of course, this is only my opinion and I might be wrong.